Legislative Issues

 

Passage of Senate Bill 47, Act 54 of 2009:

I introduced an amendment to Senate Bill 47 that allows Department of Welfare caseworkers from the county assistance offices to report suspected fraud directly to the Office of Inspector General for investigation.  The employee can report the fraud without obtaining permission from management and without fear of sanctions, which they couldn’t do until Act 54 became law.

 

“I introduced this amendment due to the serious issues uncovered by the Auditor General’s Office showing that the Department of Public Welfare had numerous cases of fraud, waste and abuse,” Delozier said, referring to her campaign promise that she hold state government accountable. “Who better to report suspected fraud but the state employees that deal with these issues daily”.

 

House Bill 1416, FY 2009-2010 State Budget:

Voted against the 2009 Budget presented by Governor Rendell which had huge spending increases and tax increases.  The massive budget spends $27.8 billion.

 

“I fought hard against this unsustainable budget because it was not the best approach to protecting the residents of the 88th district from paying for more state spending”, said Representative Delozier. She further stated, “Part of the budget was balanced by draining the Rainy Day Fund of $755 million, $708 from the Health Care Provider Retention Account, $150 million from the Tobacco Endowment Account and $100 million from the Medical Care Availability and Reduction Fund to balance the budget.  While we had gaps to fill in the 2009-10 budget and some of these dollars may have been needed, if we had not increased spending we would not have needed to use all the dollars last year and would have had some left to help fill the gaps we have in the 2010-11 budget.”

 

House Bills 2000-2001

I co-sponsored House Bill’s 2000 and 2001 which would allow for the office of the jury commissioner to be abolished by a referendum vote. The office of the jury commissioner was originally designed to assist in the selection of potential jurors. With the influx of technology, computers handle the selection of jurors today. The elimination of this office will provide Cumberland County the opportunity to save tax dollars and cut spending.

 

House Bill 169

House Bill 169 would increase the prize limits our local community organizations (VFW’s, American Legions, fire companies, and private clubs) would be allowed to award. The current law, which has not been updated since 1988, allows for a $5,000 weekly prize limit. Under House Bill 169 that limit would increase to $25,000 a week. The increased prize limits would allow for more community giving and allow for the community organizations to use a portion of raised money for capital investment projects.

 

As a co-sponsor of this bill, on March 22, 2010, I had a press conference to urge legislative leaders to bring this bill to the House floor for a vote. Local communities throughout Pennsylvania would benefit greatly from the passage of this bi-partisan legislation.

 

Introduction of House Bill 1870

After the Governor held state workers hostage again during the 2009-10 budget negations, I introduced House Bill 1870 so that people’s families would not have to suffer at the hands of political posturing and bitter partisanship. The bill would provide for the payment of state employees during a lengthy budget impasse. The line items to pay workers do not change and therefore are non-negotiable. This bill was introduced to protect state employees and their families from being used as pawns in the Rendell Administrations  nefarious game of chess.

 

Introduction of House Bill 2171

This bill that I introduced would prohibit a government agency from hiring a lobbyist to lobby another state agency or members of the General Assembly. Government needs to control spending whenever possible and prohibiting this expenditure is necessary to eliminate wasteful abuse of taxpayer dollars. All facets of the state government are working towards the same goal, the betterment of the Commonwealth. I do not see a reason for a state agency to hire someone to lobby for them when the lines of communication should be open at all times between state agencies and the legislature.